Spybot Logo
Go Back   Safer-Networking Forums > Blogs > PepiMK
Register ProjectsBlogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Home Support Download Donate

The founder of Spybot-S&D blogging about a few things too techy for the news section of Spybot-S&D website. And maybe also about things too unrelated, who knows.
Rate this Entry

What Symantecs CEO thinks about privacy really...

Posted 2008-10-21 at 10:37 by PepiMK

I just yesterday stumbled across an interview with Symantecs CEO John W. Thompson in German engineers magazin VDI-Nachrichten.

On the topic of a fake passport for "Elvis Presley" passing controls at an airport in the Netherlands, he suggested:
"Vorstellen kann ich mir da bereits eher - jetzt in Bezug auf das Internet -, dass man auf Basis des Leumundes eines Anwenders vorgeht. Man schaut, was ist das für ein Anwender, welche Seiten hat er besucht, welche Gefahr geht von ihm aus? Auf Basis dieser Infos lässt sich dann ein Profil erstellen und Unternehmen können darauf entsprechend reagieren."
Translated into English, he said he could imagine, in regards to the Internet, that decision could be made based on the reputation of users. One could watch which websites he visits [and?] which dangers are resulting from that. Based on this information a profile could be created that would allow corporations [!] to react to that.

So, to get this straight, this man believes in monitoring Internet users to find out how dangerous they are, and give that information to companies.

Asked about the privacy issues there, he did not see any concerns there, and further critized European privacy dealings as going too far:
In Europa ist immer alles eine Frage des Datenschutzes. Die EU sagt: Eine IP-Adresse ist privat, das ist übertrieben. Datenschutz wird über alles gestülpt, dient oft nur als Vorwand. Ich frage Sie: Was ist schützenswert an einer IP-Adresse?
Next to the issue that monitoring visited websites goes a bit beyond simply IP addresses, static IP addresses are not that different from a phone number or postal address. I remember very well from university times that a dorm IP could easily be tracked to the name of a person in minutes. Static IPs can be attacked to get more information about the owner - and Symantec very well knows how that many computers are not safe enough to withstand that. IP addresses might thus easily and without official requests involved uncover the personal identity of a websurfer.

Anyway... creating profiles on all visited websites and sharing them with companies as a way to make the web safer? Seems like someone didn't read George Orwells 1984 (or took his inspirations from that). All else I can say is that I would not trust the anti-spyware software from a company whose CEO believes in total monitoring of users (or just call it spyware) itself!
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 9840 Comments 3
« Prev     Main     Next »
Total Comments 3

Comments

  1. Old Comment
    spybotsandra's Avatar
    wow.....can't believe that he really said this in an interview.....was he even thinking before speaking? ;-)
    Posted 2008-10-21 at 10:39 by spybotsandra spybotsandra is online now
  2. Old Comment
    drragostea's Avatar
    Giving off private information? This is like a stop-and-desist letter. Yeah, I mean this tactic would be successful for a short-term period. It will fall. Crash and burn.

    People will find ways to exploit this too.
    Parasites.
    Posted 2008-10-23 at 04:29 by drragostea drragostea is offline
  3. Old Comment

    saving your IP's

    On the note of programs recording your IP and sharing it.
    I just wanted to leave a plug about ixquick. This search engine states that it does not record your IP when you use it. Therefore I prefer it to other search engines.
    Posted 2010-03-05 at 06:05 by Rogercsmc Rogercsmc is offline
 

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 16:54.


Copyright © 2000-2010 Safer-Networking Limited. All rights reserved.