Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: HOSTS file changed by Spybot? Why?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    7

    Default HOSTS file changed by Spybot? Why?

    I think my original post about this did not come through, or at least I can't find it. My apologies if it gets duplicated.

    Can someone tell me:
    1) The reason for Spybot to change the hosts file in such a dump way
    2) The implications of removing the added lines (attached)

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Spybot Advisor Team [Retired] md usa spybot fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,859

    Default

    phermi:

    From the title of your post:

    Quote Originally Posted by phermi View Post
    HOSTS file changed by Spybot? Why?
    If you are running Spybot 1.5.2 and immunized the item "Global (Hosts)" under Windows, you added Spybot's HOSTS file entries to your system's HOSTS file.

    Quote Originally Posted by phermi View Post
    Can someone tell me:
    1) The reason for Spybot to change the hosts file in such a dump way
    2) The implications of removing the added lines (attached)
    1) If you mean dumb way, I don't think it's dumb. Unlike most processes that add entries to the HOSTS file it identifies what added the entries.
    2) The sites listed will no longer be blocked.

    Getting an answer is one thing, learning is another.


    Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition running on a 2.40GHz IntelŪ PentiumŪ 4 Processor with 512 MB of RAM and a 533 MHz System Bus.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Thanks for you reply.

    It is DUMB and let me tell you why. If in fact you want to BLOCK a website you do not need to create a loopback request to your machine. I am sure Spybot developers can find a more elegant way of doing so that re-directing web sites requests to the localhost.

  4. #4
    Spybot Advisor Team [Retired] md usa spybot fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,859

    Default

    phermi:

    If you have a more "elegant" way of blocking access to sites that works for all browsers and processes that access the internet using a domain name, I'm sure Patrick Kolla would be receptive to your suggestion.

    Getting an answer is one thing, learning is another.


    Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition running on a 2.40GHz IntelŪ PentiumŪ 4 Processor with 512 MB of RAM and a 533 MHz System Bus.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    7

    Default

    For you and Patrick:

    Let's use HOSTS also to store signatures and get ride of include files. If we can add anything the progam need into USERS FILES why do we need anything on the PROGRAM FILES? Or, we can use the registry for that too.

    If the progam knows the ste to block, Patrick or anyone else needs to find to pur that somewhere else. The success of the Spyware protection can not depend on an USER file that many people use for other purposes.

    Please feel free not to reply any more.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •