Immunization count nearly doubled

[blues]

Heavily outdated? I would consider it dated and not updated in a while... but not heavily outdated. Of course it's a small chance you'll encounter those sites right?

Why not give MVPHosts a test? Although it only supports IE, I think.

i encounter sites that are blocked by the hostsfiles more than the ones that are blocked by the immunizers, and i am not counting the adservers in that ,because they i encounter often, but if you are talking about that sites that are blocked by ie-spyad then that is another case, because it is outdated, and the ones that i encounter the most which is blocked are innocent looking sites, and that is often. the hostsfiles i have used has also worked when i have used firefox, but i dont know how it works on others computers.

[md usa spybot fan]

Gentlemen:

Please be considerate and stop hijacking threads.

The title of this thread is "Immunization count nearly doubled".

ChalupaPatrol asked for an explanation of why that occurred. I only referenced IE-SPYADs because it was the best plain English explanation of what the new Spybot "(Secure Domains)" immunization was accomplishing.

I did not recommend using IE-SPYADs and I certainly intend to start a tit for tat discussion about the age of the IE-SPYAD database or the pros or cons of placing things in Internet Explorer’s Restricted Sites zone vs. placing sites in the HOSTS file.

Respectfully,
md usa spybot fan

[ChalupaPatrol]

Please be considerate and stop hijacking threads.
The title of this thread is "Immunization count nearly doubled".
ChalupaPatrol asked for an explanation of why that occurred.

I completely agree, but didn't want to say anything. Thank you.

[drragostea]

No further questions. This won't happen again the future. Apologies to ChalupaPatrol.

--drragostea