|
|
|||||||
| Register | Projects | Blogs | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
|
CDilla (PUPS.sbi & Revision.sbi tabs) & SideStep (PUPS.sbi tab) are checked in Ignore Products. I didn't check them. If Spybot S&D 1.4 checks these automatically, why does it do this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member of Team Spybot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 23,454
Rated LASSHes: 16
|
Hello Cumberland.
PUPS are potentially unwanted programs. Users choice.
__________________
UNITE-ASAP Microsoft MVP. Consumer Security 2006-2010 Please help us improve Spybot, download our distributed testing client |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Spybot Advisor Team
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,879
|
A little more on the subject.
Short answer: If you would like to include these items in a scan:
Long answer: When Spybot-S&D 1.4 was released the C:%path%\Spybot - Search & Destroy\Excludes\Bots file that controls product exclusions contained the following entries by default:
At that time if you went into the "Ignore products" list the following four (4) items were checked:
Subsequently, it appears that the detection for New.Net - PUPS has been replaced with a detection for NewDotNet - PUPS hereby negating the original New.Net default exclusion.
__________________
Getting an answer is one thing, learning is another. Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition running on a 2.40GHz IntelŪ PentiumŪ 4 Processor with 512 MB of RAM and a 533 MHz System Bus. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
|
Spybot S&D recommends ignoring CDilla and SideStep. Why should we include them in a scan?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member of Team Spybot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 23,454
Rated LASSHes: 16
|
Hello.
CDilla and SideStep no longer met the criteria for inclusion as spyware etc and thus became PUPS. However some people do not wish to have these applications on their system and consider them undesirable. Also people tend to click yes on installation of programs without reading the EULAS and then change their mind afterwards. I can only suggest you Google information about the PUPS in question and make your own decision as to whether you wish to scan for them or not. Hope that helps.
__________________
UNITE-ASAP Microsoft MVP. Consumer Security 2006-2010 Please help us improve Spybot, download our distributed testing client |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
|
Thanks. Now I understand. I thought each tab on the Ignore Products page in Spybot S&D listed a different type of spyware. It would be helpful if the help page for Ignore Products in Spybot S&D could be annotated with yours and md usa spybot fan's replys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6
|
A little further info Cumberland,
C-Dilla, cdilla and cdac11ba.exe are MacroVision’s SafeCast copy protection software to protect downloaded software from illegal copying. Sidestep automatically compares prices side-by-side in travel sites and product comparisons. They don't send our surfing info back to anyone, per the latest google search, so are mostly 'harmless' and not actually ad/spyware.
__________________
Folding for Life |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: yah ye betcha'
Posts: 45
|
so becuz it cant technically be considered ad/spyware. it's ignored? what if someone utilizes the fact that they are ignored and stores malicious things within them...or is that not possible?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
|
Got it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1
|
I don't know why also it does this!
__________________
Health Insurance Quotes |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|