BillGio,
Very, very bad thing? Well, that depends ... if speed is the only consideration, sure. OTOH, it's safer to allow variable size, so as to accommodate whatever virtual memory is required at...
Type: Posts; User: j_ds_au; Keyword(s):
BillGio,
Very, very bad thing? Well, that depends ... if speed is the only consideration, sure. OTOH, it's safer to allow variable size, so as to accommodate whatever virtual memory is required at...
patclash,
Hey, that's a radical idea!!! Restrict swap file size to force S&D to start up faster. I'll give that a try, but surely there must be side-effects? If S&D is prevented from doing its...
Hi all,
Yes, I think we can agree that it's the limited RAM that's causing the very, very slow start-up of Spybot S&D. From patclash's post, it seems that things can be even worse than my...
Hi,
Just started with S&D 1.6.2, and installed recent definition updates (using spybotsd_includes.exe).
Hardware is Pentium II, 450MHz, 192M RAM. O/S is Windows 98SE (with Unofficial Service...