Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Slow Scans

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4

    Default Slow Scans

    I have found a lady experiencing this too. It was fine a week ago.
    I checked it out and she is free of malware. PC fairly clutter free too. She runs CCleaner....

    I have run various other malware checkers over the PC and checked out stuff loading on start etc etc.

    Its not the problem.
    Its only Spybot too, not other programs.
    It takes ages on AdGoblin but especially on CoolWebSearch.
    It didn't use to.

    It doesn't on my PC either, or most of my other clients PCs.

    She has a 1.7Ghz Celeron, 256Mb DDR266, 40Gb HDD with 60% free, WinXP Home SP2.

    So what happened? It must be some change to Spybot and these people getting the slowness at that stage must have something in common but it beats me what....

  2. #2
    Spybot Advisor Team [Retired] md usa spybot fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,859

    Default

    Please see:

    Getting an answer is one thing, learning is another.


    Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition running on a 2.40GHz IntelŪ PentiumŪ 4 Processor with 512 MB of RAM and a 533 MHz System Bus.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4

    Default

    I've read these other threads to death. People variously attribute it to AVG being resident, Multicore CPUs etc.

    I ran it in safe mode and it still takes ages.

    It does not do it on my own PC and I have a number of things resident - NOD32, Counterspy, GhostSecuritySuite.

    Have uninstalled, reinstalled, no help.

    Updated yesterday to see if new definitions helped, nope.

    It is the first PC I have found this to be a problem on, all my other clients using it are fine.

  4. #4
    Member of Team Spybot PepiMK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,601

    Default

    Well, please read my last post in that to-death-topic, which has an updated file that is the result of todays work, and sped things up considerably even here where I did not notice the problem at first (only through looking into NOD32s AMON statistics).
    Just remember, love is life, and hate is living death.
    Treat your life for what it's worth, and live for every breath
    (Black Sabbath: A National Acrobat)

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4

    Default Read mine

    Read mine

  6. #6
    Member of Team Spybot PepiMK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,601

    Default

    Only that you totally missed the file I posted...
    Just remember, love is life, and hate is living death.
    Treat your life for what it's worth, and live for every breath
    (Black Sabbath: A National Acrobat)

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4

    Default

    I did not. And she is downloading it.

    But you missed the point I was trying to make - its NOT avg.

  8. #8
    Member of Team Spybot PepiMK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,601

    Default

    It is... and it is not

    It is AVG in the sense that AVG is scanning each and every file accessed. Thats its good right, and happened with other AVs as well - we finally were able to monitor it with NOD32, for example, even though it didn't slow down some machines, only some.

    And it is us in the sense that we trigger that on-access scan too often. And that's unlucky

    And the fault... still to be found, funny thing is we didn't change that part of the code that was now triggering the AV on-access scan, but that AVG or someone else would release a new update at the same time we release this one and exactly these two would conflict is unlikely either... I'm still analyzing the underlying libraries from Borland (1.4 was compiled with Delphi 2005, 1.5 was compiled with Delphi 2006, so I'm going to look for changes in Delphis runtime library).
    Just remember, love is life, and hate is living death.
    Treat your life for what it's worth, and live for every breath
    (Black Sabbath: A National Acrobat)

  9. #9
    Member of Team Spybot PepiMK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,601

    Default

    Hmmm wait... if on that machine, the scan really hangs there, it seems to be a different problem. Sorry, its getting difficult to keep all these cases apart from each other, were quite a bit today about slowdowns
    The products you mentioned may still be slowing down one further user, so we'll take a look at them tomorrow (only 47 minutes left of this day )
    Just remember, love is life, and hate is living death.
    Treat your life for what it's worth, and live for every breath
    (Black Sabbath: A National Acrobat)

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Guess you're already sawing zzzzzzzzzzzzz's, but I applied your new dll after running a scan with the old one (that one took 12'17" ).

    Scanning under the same exact conditions (after a re-start and with all un-necessary services shut down, like the first one), the new dll turned in a time of 9'52" (approx. 18% faster).

    Looks good, so far - as long as no sacrifice of detections is taking place. Pete

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •