Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38

Thread: Acid 3 Test Comparison

  1. #11
    Junior Member PaulWin98SE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    26

    Default

    I use a few browsers. IE 5.5 (Which was no longer supported for Windows 98, only Windows Me and up updates for it.) And FireFox 2.0.0.12. The only Browser which was last supported for Windows 98SE was 6. Which I have never used on my system, except in Me.

    I tried out two other browsers: The World Browser, it turns out to be a very nice FireFox like shell for the IE engine. It's not Firefox in looks or feel. Just some features like and more. I have since uninstalled it.

    There is another browser which it seems to be based on the same browser engine as FireFox, its called K-Meleon. If failed the acid3 test just as FireFox did.

  2. #12
    Senior Member honda12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    682

    Smile k-meleon

    ah yes, k-meleon the speed demon!

    I like it due to the fact you do not need to install it (and because it fast!)

    But, it lacks the features that other browsers have, so I don't use it as my primary one.

    It is still very useful, as you can run it on a pen drive (or memory sticks, as we call them here in the UK), even without needing to install portable apps
    -honda12

  3. #13
    Senior Member honda12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    682

    Wink Firefox 3 beta 5

    Firefox 3 beta 5 has been released so here's how it did on the acid 3 test:



    I have to congratulate Firefox - 71/100 is a great score, especially for a beta!
    -honda12

  4. #14
    Junior Member PaulWin98SE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    26

    Default Opera 9.52

    I just recently intalled Opera 9.52 (a 9.6 is available.) And it did well, though failing: 84/100

  5. #15
    Junior Member PaulWin98SE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    26

    Default Opera 9.52

    Neither Opera 9.52 nor IE5.5 can upload attachments to this forum. Only Firefox 2.0.0.17 works correctly here.

    Here is the image/attachment of Opera 9.52:

  6. #16
    Member of Team Spybot tashi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    30,667

    Default

    Hi there,
    Quote Originally Posted by PaulWin98SE View Post
    I just recently intalled Opera 9.52 (a 9.6 is available.) And it did well, though failing: 84/100
    New versions of a browser often address vulnerabilities. The two that have been fixed by the release of Opera version 9.60 are serious, warranting an upgrade.

    Cheers.

    Advisory 901

    Advisory 902



    Microsoft MVP Reconnect 2018-
    Windows Insider MVP 2016-2018
    Microsoft Consumer Security MVP 2006-2016

  7. #17
    Senior Member drragostea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    @Home
    Posts
    3,674

    Default

    Ooof. I don't know how Safari will do this time, but Firefox 3.0.3 scored a 74/100.

  8. #18
    Senior Member Tom.K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Universe / Milky Way / Solar System / Earth / Europe / Croatia
    Posts
    735

    Default

    70/100 is the result in Firefox 3.0.1 (I've accidentally ran the test without disabling NoScript and AdBlock Plus first, but there is no change), but if you are in offline mode, the result fails with 51/100.
    Strange is that Firefox 3.0.1 has lower result than Firefox 3 beta 5 and it seems that Firefox 3.0.1 passes the Linktest while Firefox 3 beta 5 does not.
    Result for Firefox 3.0.1:
    Code:
    Failed 30 tests.
    Test 01 failed: Component returned failure code: 0x80004001 (NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED) [nsIDOMDocumentTraversal.createNodeIterator]
    Test 02 failed: Component returned failure code: 0x80004001 (NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED) [nsIDOMDocumentTraversal.createNodeIterator]
    Test 03 failed: Component returned failure code: 0x80004001 (NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED) [nsIDOMDocumentTraversal.createNodeIterator]
    Test 04 failed: Component returned failure code: 0x80004001 (NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED) [nsIDOMDocumentTraversal.createNodeIterator]
    Test 07 failed: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsIDOMRange.cloneContents]
    Test 09 failed: expected 'Hello Wonderful KittyHow are you?' but got '' - toString() on range selecting Document gave wrong output
    Test 10 failed: expected 'result' but got '' - toString() didn't work for attribute node
    Test 11 failed: when inserting <a> into Document with another child: wrong exception raised
    Test 26 passed, but took 233ms (less than 30fps)
    Test 30 failed: Component returned failure code: 0x80070057 (NS_ERROR_ILLEGAL_VALUE) [nsIDOMEventTarget.dispatchEvent]
    Test 33 failed: expected '1' but got '0' - whitespace error in class processing
    Test 38 failed: p.childNodes[1].replaceWholeText is not a function
    Test 39 failed: expected '1' but got '0' - :nth-child(odd) failed with child 0
    Test 40 failed: expected '1' but got '0' - part 1:0
    Test 46 failed: expected 'uppercase' but got 'none' - case a failed (index 1)
    Test 54 failed: expected 'HIDDEN' but got 'hidden' - input control's type content attribute was wrong
    Test 60 failed: attribute not specified after removal
    Test 61 failed: expected ' te  st ' but got 'te st' - class attribute's value was wrong
    Test 65 passed, but took 38ms (less than 30fps)
    Test 68 failed: Unpaired surrogate handled wrongly (input was '�text', output was '�ext')
    Test 69 failed: timeout -- could be a networking issue
    Test 71 failed: expected 'null' but got '' - internalSubset wrong (first test)
    Test 74 failed: getSVGDocument missing on <iframe> element.
    Test 75 failed: anim.beginElement is not a function
    Test 76 failed: expected '0' but got '100' - Incorrect animVal value after svg animation.
    Test 77 failed: expected '3' but got '0' - getNumberOfChars returned incorrect string length.
    Test 78 failed: Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsIDOMSVGTextPositioningElement.getRotationOfChar]
    Test 79 failed: doc is null
    Test 80 failed: Script in XHTML didn't execute
    Test 82 failed: unexpected 1 in t3
    Test 95 failed: expected 'string' but got 'number' - type of |"2147483648"| is not string
    Test 98 failed: expected 'Sparrow' but got '' - document.title did not update dynamically
    Total elapsed time: 8.60s
    I will try to install Safari 3.1.2 and check result. It should be very good.
    Last edited by Tom.K; 2008-10-09 at 20:28.
    N/A.

  9. #19
    Senior Member Tom.K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Universe / Milky Way / Solar System / Earth / Europe / Croatia
    Posts
    735

    Default

    Result for Safari 3.1.2: 74/100
    See attachment.

    P.S. Look at post #9 and check the link. Safari 4.0 beta has passed 100/100 in less than 1 second!
    Last edited by Tom.K; 2008-10-10 at 21:32.
    N/A.

  10. #20
    Junior Member PaulWin98SE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    26

    Default Opera 9.6

    Here is the result of for http://acid3.acidtests.org/

    9.52 was 84/100, 9.6 is 85/100

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •