First, I want to thanks for alldevelopers,..
I was using before S&D1.3 with Spywareblaster software.
After I upgrade it to S&D 1.4, do we need still SpywareBlaster software?
Best Regards,
Akif
First, I want to thanks for alldevelopers,..
I was using before S&D1.3 with Spywareblaster software.
After I upgrade it to S&D 1.4, do we need still SpywareBlaster software?
Best Regards,
Akif
Hello,
We recommended Javacool's Spywareblaster to our users in the past.
But we decided against this in our new version, because it confused a lot of users,
who thought our product had been hijacked by this "advertisement".
If you want to download it you can go to their website:
http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html
Best regards
Sandra
Team Spybot
SpywareBlaster has always had more total entries, by about four times, than Spybot's Immunize, which are otherwise equivalent features and have always had some overlap in protection.Originally Posted by akif.kiris
Basically, the SpywareBlaster lists are simply more aggressive, so they're larger. If you agree with this more aggressive stance, you will still want to use SpywareBlaster.
Actual numbers:
Spybot as of 2006-04-07 updates.
SpywareBlaster as of 2006-04-03 updates.
.................. Restricted .. Restricted
........................ zone ........ zone .... ActiveX ..... Cookies
................... by domain .... by range .... blocked ..... blocked
Spybot ................. 1649 .......... 40 ........ 805 .......... 93
SpywareBlaster ......... 1984 ........... 0 ....... 3240 ......... 209
Both together .......... 2760 .......... 40 ....... 3361 ......... 263
Getting an answer is one thing, learning is another.
Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition running on a 2.40GHz IntelŪ PentiumŪ 4 Processor with 512 MB of RAM and a 533 MHz System Bus.