Petition to remove TeaTimer from default installation.

[ght1]

Only in cases where the Allow/Deny dialog would have been shown (which was on unidentified only anyway), it would get skipped with paranoid mode disabled.

So with paranoid mode disabled any unidentified action will get automatic "Allow"?

[ght1]

PepiMK?

[PepiMK]

Your assumption was quite correct

And I invite everyone reading this trying out and commenting... we need feedback to get this out soon

[ght1]

Very good So my wife won't get any pop ups from TeaTimer in the future!

[Rouke]

Could it be An idea to use A "Teatimer" that's automatically uploading the registry locations that are being allowed or blocked to the lassh-database?
Users should allow that functionality. Or could be requested.

[Greyfox]

PepiMK,

Paranoid mode toggle seems to work OK, however I have a query about terminology.

With Paranoid mode enabled, when for instance the screen saver is changed (I toggle between none and Windows XP as a simple test for Teatimer) the Allow/Deny dialogue comes up as it should. When I click on Allow, there are two messages in the balloon. The second one is "identified as User decision", which is correct. The first one is "Resident allowed the change .... based on your white list". I have always associated the user white list for Teatimer as those decisions made with the Remember box ticked, and it wasn't ticked in the test run above.

[PepiMK]

Hmmm right, the first part of the text is a bit misleading. That first part is one thats fixed for all balloons, so just te second part has to be added. Sounds fine for the half a dozen internal white/blacklist things (file scan, certificate, lassh entry status, user list, etc.), but sounds a bit off for user decisions indeed.