The thing is: Safer Networking team has mentioned more than once that they don't see users security that way. They'll keep it for free for everyone, without reduced protection features.Originally Posted by Root Canal
The thing is: Safer Networking team has mentioned more than once that they don't see users security that way. They'll keep it for free for everyone, without reduced protection features.
Still no response to the cnet.com review!
See http://download.cnet.com/Spybot-Sear...-10122137.html
Why do you care so much about that useless review? It says nothing others don't know already: it's behind in malware detection, when compared, for example, with Malwarebytes Anti-Malware. But, only with Malwarebytes Anti-Malware Pro (a paid-for product), which offers real-time protection.
Spybot - Search & Destroy vs Malwarebytes Anti-Malware Free Edition, Spybot wins, because it offers real-time protection, both passive and active. Malwarebytes Anti-Malware and SUPERAntispyware, both free versions, do not offer real-time protection.
You want Safer Networking to KILL real-time protection. Does that make any sense? More than ever a security solution should provide more than just malware detection, and you want them to stay put in the past? Get real. Malware has evolved, and anti-malware applications also need to. Other security vendors already started doing it years ago, others still are in the process of doing it. I hope Spybot 2.0 comes fast and ready for a fight, WITH real-time protection!
Why should we respond to an old review where an old version like 1.4 is tested ? (yeah, it is 1.4., have a look at the video)
That does not make sense. Sorry, but we are not wasting our time here anymore. Everything that needs to be said is said.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote