Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Cimuz...possible false positive?

  1. #21
    Spybot Advisor Team [Retired] md usa spybot fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005



    The fact Spybot is not taking a backup appears to be another problem in addition to the original detection of:
    • Cimuz: <$WINSOCK> (Winsock, ...)

    Getting an answer is one thing, learning is another.

    Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition running on a 2.40GHz IntelŪ PentiumŪ 4 Processor with 512 MB of RAM and a 533 MHz System Bus.

  2. #22
    Senior Member Yodama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005


    Quote Originally Posted by timzak View Post

    I don't know where Yodama came up with mswsck32.dll as neither I nor hvtemp mentioned that in our posts?
    I came up with mswsck32.dll because that is what our detection is looking for in this context.
    For the time being we have removed this Winsockcheck from our detection and are going to conduct more tests to avoid such issues again.
    born in the shadow to die in the shadow, that is the fate of the shinobi

    Spybot S&D Downloads

    Please help us improve Spybot and download our distributed testing client.

  3. #23
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006



    Thanks for your help. I noticed in the latest update I no longer get the Cimuz detection.

    I appreciate the hard work you and your teammates put into this free product. I think sometimes we lose sight of this fact, but I wanted to let you know your collective efforts are not unnoticed!

  4. #24
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006

    Default Tnx!

    Yeah.. tnx.

    I like the respons and the people at this site.
    Tnx again for a great program...and a quick action... I will keep using it and recommend it to my friends.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts