I was to mention this some time ago, but only now it crossed my mind.
Why the heck wasn't something done so far to make TeaTimer use less memory than it uses now?
At this precise moment it is consuming nearly 37.000 K.
SUPERAntiSpyware demands only ~500K
See the difference?
Why the heck wasn't something done so far to make TeaTimer use less memory than it uses now?
At this precise moment it is consuming nearly 37.000 K.
SUPERAntiSpyware demands only ~500K
See the difference?